Sketches & Drawings

Field Report 11.12.2016: Rutland Gate


The small, beautifully twisted sapling observed in the hollow, just below the ridge at Rutland Gate; 12 November, 2016. Copyright © 2017 Sanjay R Singhal. All rights reserved.

FIELD REPORT 11.12.2016

To open the Report, simply double-click on the words “FIELD REPORT” above, and the PDF file will open for you; you may then download the file to your own computer, or read here, at your leisure.

Substantiation of this Report may be based upon my own investigations at Rutland Gate, which began in the autumn of 2014,[1] [2] and which have continued, albeit sporadically.[3] [4] [5] [6]  Further substantiation is minimal, at best; there are no published reports for Green, Jefferson, Rock, or Walworth Counties on the BFRO website, [7] although reports for Dane and Waukesha Counties are available.[8] [9]  Nonetheless, a cursory review of same suggests considerable activity in this region.

The combination of physical, visual, audible and/or olfactory events described in this Report are: 

  1. The long, forked branch, appended to the large, twisted-off tree on the cycling path;
  2. The smaller, twisted-off sapling observed beneath same;
  3. The small piece of white cotton felt, pinned to a high branch above the ravine;
  4. The possible observation of…something…standing across the ravine, looking at us;
  5. The sudden, rapid disappearance of same;
  6. The pair of twisted-off saplings, aligned directly to the large branch assembly;
  7. The small, twisted-off sapling observed in the hollow;
  8. The large, shelter-like branch assembly observed in the hollow.

These behaviours, and the history of my own experiences, may be considered sufficient to suggest the presence of EC [10] at Rutland Gate, in the late autumn of 2016.

The time discrepancy, as evidenced by my mobile text message and my wristwatch, requires careful and further review; I have not yet examined the time-stamps upon my photographs. Without additional, substantive confirmation, no conclusion should be inferred or comprehended.  Again, it should be noted that this discrepancy appears remarkably similar to my experience at Rutland Gate on 3 October 2016.

An unusual number of subjective events also occurred.  While these cannot be considered conclusive evidence, neither should they be discounted. Although it is reasonable to review the impact of non-objective stimuli in this Report, such effects, while personally quite vivid and at times overwhelming, are nonetheless nearly impossible to substantiate with any measure of certainty. 

[1] Sanjay R Singhal. Field Report 09.23.2014b: Rutland Gate. Beyond The Forest. https://beyondtheforestblog.wordpress.com/2015/09/21/field-report-09-23-2014b-rutland-gate/. 21 September 2015. Web. Accessed 21 September 2015.

[2] Ibid. Field Report 12.20.2014: Rutland Gate, Parts One and Two. Beyond The Forest. https://beyondtheforestblog.wordpress.com/2015/09/22/field-report-12-20-2014-rutland-gate-parts-1-2/. 22 September 2015. Web. Accessed 23 October 2015.

[3] Ibid.  Field Report 01.17.2015: Rutland Gate.  Beyond The Forest.  https://beyondtheforestblog.wordpress.com/2015/10/24/field-report-01-17-2015-rutland-gate/.  24 October 2015.  Web.  Accessed 8 October 2016.

[4] Ibid.  Field Report 03.15.2015: Rutland Gate.  Beyond The Forest.  https://beyondtheforestblog.wordpress.com/2015/11/06/field-report-03-15-2015-rutland-gate/.  6 November 2015.  Web.  Accessed 8 October 2016. 

[5] Ibid.  Field Report 10.03.2016: Rutland Gate (with Addenda and Appendix).  Beyond The Forest.  https://beyondtheforestblog.wordpress.com/2016/10/08/field-report-10-03-2016-rutland-gate/.  8 October 2016.  Web.  Accessed 8 June 2017.

[6] Ibid.  Field Report 10.30.2016: Rutland Gate.  Beyond The Forest.  https://beyondtheforestblog.wordpress.com/2017/06/10/field-report-10-30-2016b-rutland-gate/.  10 June 2017. Web.  Accessed 13 July 2017. 

[7] BFRO Author(s).  Wisconsin.  Bigfoot Field Researchers’ Organisation.  http://www.bfro.net/GDB/state_listing.asp?state=wi.  2015.  Web.  Accessed 12 September 2015.

[8] Ibid.  Dane County, Wisconsin.  Bigfoot Field Researchers’ Organisation.  http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_county_reports.asp?state=wi&county=Dane.  2015.  Web.  Accessed 27 August 2015.

[9] Ibid.  Waukesha County, Wisconsin.  Bigfoot Field Researchers’ Organisation.  http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_county_reports.asp?state=WI&county=Waukesha.  2015.  Web.  Accessed 20 September 2015.

[10] EC, in this context, stands for “Elder Children”, as usual. 

To open the Report, simply double-click on the words “FIELD REPORT” above, and the PDF file will open for you; you may then download the file to your own computer, or read here, at your leisure.

Sanjay R Singhal, RA

150729 beyond the forest new logoPlease join Beyond The Forest/Beyond The Forest Radio on Facebook to share your comments and/or questions about this, or any other of my reports and postings!

Copyright © 2017 Sanjay R Singhal, RA.  All rights reserved.

Save

Save

Save

Save