Field Report 09.14.2016: Area B


The woods at Area B; to the best of my recollection, this is just about when the loud, bipaedal footsteps stopped…and we both realised that something…was very, very close to us. 14 September, 2016. Copyright © 2017 Sanjay R Singhal. All rights reserved.

FIELD REPORT 09.14.2016

To open the Report, simply double-click on the words “FIELD REPORT” above, and the PDF file will open for you; you may then download the file to your own computer, or read here, at your leisure.

 

Substantiation of this Report may be based upon my own accounts and experiences at Area B, and as corroborated by its owners, who have accompanied me there at all times.  Further substantiation is minimal at best; I do not know of any other persons conducting field work in this portion of Upper Michigan.  Some additional corroboration, however, may be provided by reports published by the BFRO for nearby Luce, Marquette, and Schoolcraft Counties.[1] [2] [3]  Other accounts have been located across social media, suggesting a considerable level of activity.  Further research and enquiry at this site may provide important, new information regarding EC habituation and/or migration.

The combination of physical, visual, audible and/or olfactory events described in this Report are as follows:

  1. The eerie, quiet stillness experienced throughout our investigation;
  2. The series of answering wood-knocks, both from the east and from the south;
  3. The sounds of movement in the woods, of something approaching us from the east;
  4. The loud, bipaedal footsteps, pertinent to same;
  5. The possible orbs, as presented in my photographs;
  6. The foul, unpleasant odour, noticed when we were walking along the path to the main road;
  7. The sudden, rapid dissipation of same.

These behaviours, and the history of my own experiences, may be considered sufficient to suggest the presence of EC[4] at Area B, in the early autumn of 2016…and possibly something else.

An unusual number of subjective events also occurred.  While these cannot be considered conclusive evidence, neither should they be discounted. Although it is reasonable to review the impact of non-objective stimuli in this Report, such effects, while personally quite vivid and at times overwhelming, are nonetheless nearly impossible to substantiate with any measure of certainty.

[1] BFRO Author(s).  Luce County, Michigan.  Bigfoot Field Researchers’ Organisation.  http://bfro.net/GDB/show_county_reports.asp?state=mi&county=Luce.  2016.  Web.  Accessed 17 July 2016.

[2] Ibid.  Marquette County, Michigan.  Bigfoot Field Researchers’ Organisation.  http://bfro.net/GDB/show_county_reports.asp?state=mi&county=Marquette.  2016.  Web.  Accessed 17 July 2016.

[3] Ibid.  Schoolcraft County, Michigan.  Bigfoot Field Researchers’ Organisation.  http://bfro.net/GDB/show_county_reports.asp?state=mi&county=Schoolcraft.  2016.  Web.  Accessed 17 July 2016.

[4] EC, in this context, stands for “Elder Children”, as usual.

To open the Report, simply double-click on the words “FIELD REPORT” above, and the PDF file will open for you; you may then download the file to your own computer, or read here, at your leisure.

 

Sanjay R Singhal, RA

150729 beyond the forest new logoPlease join Beyond The Forest on Facebook to share your comments and/or questions about this, or any other of my reports and postings!

Copyright © 2017 Sanjay R Singhal, RA.  All rights reserved.

Save

Save

Save

Advertisements

One comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s