Field Report 08.25.2012: Area R (with Addendum)


Two of the bare, human-like prints observed in the wet, muddy ground near the pond at Area R, 25 August, 2012. Copyright © 2015 Sanjay R Singhal.  All rights reserved.

FIELD REPORT 08.25.2012A

FIELD REPORT 08.25.2012B

FIELD REPORT 08.25.2012 ADDENDUM 01

To open either the Report or the Addendum, simply double-click on the words “FIELD REPORT” or “ADDENDUM” above, and the PDF file will open for you; you may then download the file to your own computer, or read here, at your leisure.

Substantiation of this Report is minimal at best; it is provided only by my own witness, and by those other persons who accompanied me to Area R: Reed Clark, Emily Davis, and Smith Jerrod. As of this writing, I am unaware of any other investigations in this area, which I might reference.

Nonetheless, my continued experiences at Area R, alone and/or with others, suggests a possibility of some population of EC, either in residence or in passage; said possibility is evidenced by physical, visual, audible and/or olfactory behaviours, vis-à-vis visual sightings, auditory and olfactory experiences, and physical traces, including branch assemblies, footprints, et al.

The combination of physical, visual, audible and/or olfactory events described in this Report are as follows:

1. The possible glyphs observed near the bike trail, in the north reserve;
2. The possible den or shelter, formed within the tall, thick grass;
3. The areas of flattened-down grass, near the den or shelter;
4. The long, straight branches laid across the deer path in the north reserve;
5. The snapped, broken centres of the long, straight branches;
6. The curious, grid-like arrangements of long, straight branches in the meadow;
7. The large bedding area, beneath the Northern Pin Oak tree;
8. The suspended branch assemblies in the Black Oak tree;
9. The series of three bare, human-like prints observed near the pond;
10. The possible branch assemblies observed near the dried-up pond;
11. The very large bedding area observed near the mown path;
12. The loud, clear tree-knocks heard and then repeated in the grove;
13. The double tree-knocks, heard and then repeated in the grove;
14. The large, possible footprint on the mown path;
15. The strange, laughing sound, like an ape’s gibber from a Tarzan film.

These behaviours, and the history of my own experience, may be considered sufficient confirmation of the presence of EC at Area R, in the late summer of 2012.

A number of other subjective events occurred. While these cannot be considered conclusive evidence, neither should they be discounted. Although it is reasonable to review the impact of non-objective stimuli in this Report, such effects, while personally quite vivid and at times overwhelming, are nonetheless nearly impossible to substantiate with any measure of certainty.

To open either the Report or the Addendum, simply double-click on the words “FIELD REPORT” or “ADDENDUM” above, and the PDF file will open for you; you may then download the file to your own computer, or read here, at your leisure.

Sanjay R Singhal, RA

BEYOND THE FOREST LOGO

Please feel free to like/join my Facebook page and post your comments and/or questions about this, or any other of my reports and postings; there are more reports being issued, and more branch-assembly analyses, so stay tuned!

Copyright © 2015 Sanjay R Singhal, RA.  All rights reserved.

Advertisements

One comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s