Field Report 06.30.2012: San Mateo County (with Addenda)

SS120630.CA065f
Close-up of Photograph #SS120630.CA065, presenting the strange, skull-like face and head of a large, broad-shouldered figure with thick, hairy arms, possibly holding a dog…could it be the Labrador?  San Gregorio State Beach; 30 June, 2012.  Copyright © 2015 Sanjay R Singhal.  All rights reserved.
???????????????????????????????
One of the large tipi-like assemblies observed on the shoreline of the lagoon at San Gregorio State Beach; 30 June, 2012.  Copyright © 2015 Sanjay R Singhal.  All rights reserved.

FIELD REPORT 06.30.2012v2

FIELD REPORT 06.30.2012 ADDENDUM 01

FIELD REPORT 06.30.2012 ADDENDUM 02

To open either the Report or the Addenda, simply double-click on the words “FIELD REPORT” or “ADDENDA” above, and the PDF file will open for you; you may then download the file to your own computer, or read here, at your leisure.

Substantiation of this Report may be provided by my own experience at San Gregorio State Beach in the autumn of 2004;[1] further substantiation, however, is minimal; there are no published reports for San Mateo County on the BFRO website.[2] However, a sighting was reported on Big Sur Highway in August, 1990 on the Mid-America Bigfoot Research Centre website.[3]

Further online research has revealed a possible general disinterest in San Mateo County as a habitation site and/or migration route for EC;[4] remarkably, it is not thought to be conducive to either purpose.[5] Nonetheless, it does seem apparent that other, adjacent counties have reported numerous encounters and/or sightings, many of which have been published online.[6]

The combination of physical, visual, audible and/or olfactory events described in this Report are as follows:

  1. The numerous, large tipi-like assemblies observed on the beach and around the shore of the lagoon;
  2. The statement of the park ranger, regarding same;
  3. The possible visual sighting of a dark shape in the trees, moving back and forth;
  4. The possible visual sighting of a dark shape, suddenly standing still behind a tree;
  5. The sudden appearance of the Labrador, running out of the woods, and then returning;
  6. The possible visual sighting of a figure in the brush, suddenly standing up, and then ducking down;
  7. The impression, albeit subjective, of being trailed through the woods;
  8. The large, oval depression in the hard-packed ground;
  9. The possible arrangement of branches around the dead pine tree;
  10. The sounds of movement in the woods;
  11. The impression, albeit subjective, of something approaching, and then retreating;
  12. The clear, direct sound of two loud stomps;
  13. The direct, visual sighting of a large, dark figure in the shadows, less than ten feet away;
  14. The direct, visual sighting of a large, dark-brown, hair-covered figure on the trail;
  15. The return of the Labrador;
  16. The conversation with the park ranger, regarding wildlife in the area.

These behaviours, and the history of my own experience, may be considered sufficient confirmation of the presence of EC [7] at San Gregorio State Park, in the summer of 2012.

A number of subjective events also occurred. While these cannot be considered conclusive evidence, neither should they be discounted. Although it is reasonable to review the impact of non-objective stimuli in this Report, such effects, while personally quite vivid and at times overwhelming, are nonetheless nearly impossible to substantiate with any measure of certainty.

[1] Sanjay R Singhal. Field Report 10.24.2004: San Mateo County (with Addendum). Beyond the Forest. https://beyondtheforestblog.wordpress.comg/2014/08/28/field-report-10-24-2004-san-mateo-county-with-addendum/. 28 August 2014. Web. Accessed 19 February 2015.

[2] BFRO Author(s). California. Bigfoot Field Researchers’ Organisation. http://www.bfro.net/GDB/state_listing.asp?state=ca. Date Unknown. Web. Accessed 28 August 2014.

[3] MABRC Author(s). California IBS Sighting Reports. Mid-America Bigfoot Research Centre. http://www.mid-americabigfoot.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=167&t=3984&start=150. 19 June 2011. Web. Accessed 28 August 2014.

[4] EC, in this context, stands for “Elder Children”, as usual.

[5] Karen Stolznow. Bigfoot in the Bay Area? Bay Area Skeptics. http://www.baskeptics.org/blog/08/12/077-bigfoot-bay-area. 2 December 2008. Web. Accessed 28 August 2014.

[6] There are several reports published for Santa Cruz County, immediately south of San Mateo County. BFRO Author(s). Santa Cruz County, California. Bigfoot Field Researchers’ Organisation. http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_county_reports.asp?state=ca&county=Santa+Cruz. Date Unknown. Web. Accessed 28 August 2014.

[7] EC, in this context, stands for “Elder Children”, as usual.

To open either the Report or the Addenda, simply double-click on the words “FIELD REPORT” or “ADDENDA” above, and the PDF file will open for you; you may then download the file to your own computer, or read here, at your leisure.

Sanjay R Singhal, RA

BEYOND THE FOREST LOGO

Please feel free to like/join my Facebook page and post your comments and/or questions about this, or any other of my reports and postings; there are more reports being issued, and more branch-assembly analyses, so stay tuned!

Copyright © 2015 Sanjay R Singhal, RA.  All rights reserved.

Advertisements

One comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s