Field Report 03.10.2012: Area K (with Addendum)

SS120310.K072b
My colour-block analysis (in progress) of one of the uniquely fashioned suspended-branch assemblies observed in the north woods at Area K; 10 March, 2012.  Copyright © 2015 Sanjay R Singhal.  All rights reserved.

FIELD REPORT 03.10.2012Av4

FIELD REPORT 03.10.2012Bv4

FIELD REPORT 03.10.2012 ADDENDUM 01

To open either of the Reports or the Addendum, simply double-click on the words “FIELD REPORT” or “ADDENDUM” above, and the PDF file will open for you; you may then download the file to your own computer, or read here, at your leisure.

Substantiation of this Report may be provided by the eyewitness testimony of the family residing at Area K during the early spring of 2012, [1] and by the reports of other visitors to the farm during that period; these included Russian cryptozoologist Dr Igor Bourtsev, at various times and dates. Further substantiation may also be provided by my own field work at Area K, which also began in the summer of 2011 and continued, at somewhat regular intervals, through the autumn of 2012, when the farm was sold.

By the early spring of 2012, several members of the family, as well as certain and various researchers and/or enthusiasts such as myself, were uniquely aware that a significant population of EC was residing on the property; direct, visual sightings of several individuals, during this time, permitted some clarification and identification of same. Further visits to the farm during this period also evidenced increasing physical, visual, audible and/or olfactory factors, vis-a-vis visual sightings, auditory and olfactory experiences, and physical traces, including footprints, branch assemblies, hair samples, et al.

The combination of physical, visual, audible and/or olfactory events described in Part One of this Report are:

  1. The newly fashioned branch assemblies observed in the front woods;
  2. The new wire fencing observed in the front woods, intertwined with numerous branches and twigs;
  3. The strange, owl-like face in the woods, staring out at me near the guest cottage;
  4. The strong, unpleasant odour noticed in the north woods;[2]
  5. The empty beer bottle observed in the north woods;
  6. The new, suspended-branch assemblies of various sizes and configurations, observed in the north woods, mainly near the ‘Doorway’ assembly;
  7. The new, composite-type branch assemblies observed in the north woods, utilising combinations of previously recognised types to form larger, more intricate constructions;
  8. The supplements to the ‘Raft’ assembly;
  9. The new, large, slanted-branch assembly observed in the north woods;
  10. The new, large, horizontally suspended branch assembly observed in the north woods;
  11. The twisted-off pine boughs arranged in tent-like fashion, in the pine grove, with possible bedding areas beneath them;[3]
  12. The nest-like assembly observed near the pine grove, remarkably similar to one observed at Area D;[4]
  13. The nearly empty jar of peanut butter, presenting clear, dermal ridges inside and a remarkable use of force to remove the lid;[5]
  14. The articulated deer skull, set rather deliberately upon the trail for someone to find;
  15. The three-toed canid-type prints observed near the pond; [6]
  16. The piece of wood lumber, tossed onto the farm road only a few minutes after I had passed.

The combination of physical, visual, audible and/or olfactory events described in Part Two of this Report are:

  1. The inexplicable failure of the moon to rise that night, when it should have already risen;
  2. The three loud stomps in the woods behind me, after I had mounted the deer stand;
  3. The direct, visual observation of a tall, broad white figure, moving along the trail;
  4. The sounds of swift, flurried movement in the woods around me, in the darkness;
  5. The sudden, loud wood-knocks, and the answering wood-knocks, across the swamp and woods;
  6. The loud bang of something being flung upon the ground;
  7. The repeated score of yellow and white eye-shine in the pine grove;
  8. The bright, flashing gleam of blue-white eye-shine very close to me in the darkness;
  9. The direct, visual observation of red eye-shine in the pasture;
  10. The direct, visual observation of a tall, white shape with a lupine head;
  11. The three pairs of yellow eyes, glowing brightly in the darkness.

These behaviours, and the history of my own experiences, may be considered sufficient confirmation of the presence of EC [7] and possibly DM [8][9] at Area K, in the early spring of 2012.

A number of subjective events also occurred. While these cannot be considered conclusive evidence, neither should they be discounted. Although it is reasonable to review the impact of non-objective stimuli in this Report, such effects, while personally quite vivid and at times overwhelming, are nonetheless nearly impossible to substantiate with any measure of certainty.

[1] Sanjay R Singhal. Field Report 03.10.2012A: Area K, Part 1 (with Addendum). Beyond the Forest. https://beyondtheforestblog.wordpress.com/2015/02/06/field-report-03-10-2012a-area-k-part-1-with-addendum/. 6 February 2015. Web. Accessed 6 February 2015.

[2] Chris Laursen. The Smell of Sasquatch. PSICAN: Paranormal Studies & Investigations Canada. http://psican.org/alpha/index.php?/20080830112/Cryptozoology/The-Smell-Of-Sasquatch.html. 2014. Web. Accessed 10 August 2014.

[3] Although numerous supposed bedding sites or shelters have been documented across the country, the use of fresh, green pine boughs appears quite uncommon. Patrice Lewis. Life’s Little Mysteries. Rural Revolution. http://www.rural-revolution.com/2014/04/lifes-little-mysteries.html. 16 April 2014. Web. Accessed 31 January 2015.

[4] Sanjay R Singhal. Field Report 11.13.2011: Area D. Beyond the Forest. https://beyondtheforestblog.wordpress.com/2014/12/26/field-report-11-13-2011-area-d/. 26 December 2014. Web. Accessed 27 December 2014.

[5] Accounts of EC enjoying peanut butter are quite commonly reported. Thomas Shay. The Peanut Butter Jar. Northern Kentucky Bigfoot Research Group. http://bigfootlore.blogspot.com/2013/11/the-peanut-butter-jar.html. 8 November 2013. Web. Accessed 1 February 2015.

[6] Three-toed clawed or canine-like prints are commonly supposed to be that of DM. Scott Carpenter. The Beast are [sic] Back (Dogmen Return to Bigfoot Research Area). Dogmen: Monsters are Real. http://dogman-monsters-are-real.blogspot.com/. 18 February 2014. Web. Accessed 1 February 2015.

[7] EC, in this context, stands for “Elder Children”, as usual.

[8] Linda S Godfrey. The Michigan Dogman: Werewolves and Other Canines across the USA. Madison, Wisconsin: Unexplained Research Publishing, LLC; 2010.

[9] For various reasons, which I cannot disclose here, I prefer to address this creature by its initials, rather than its full name.

To open either of the Reports or the Addendum, simply double-click on the words “FIELD REPORT” or “ADDENDUM” above, and the PDF file will open for you; you may then download the file to your own computer, or read here, at your leisure.

Sanjay R Singhal, RA

150729 beyond the forest new logoPlease feel free to like/join my Facebook page and post your comments and/or questions about this, or any other of my reports and postings; there are more reports being issued, and more branch-assembly analyses, so stay tuned!

Copyright © 2015 Sanjay R Singhal, RA.  All rights reserved.

Advertisements

One comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s