Field Report 11.01.2008: Area D

SS081101.D001a
The enormous, deeply embedded footprint in the sand; Area D, 1 November 2008.  Copyright © 2014 Sanjay R Singhal.  All rights reserved.

FIELD REPORT 11.01.2008Av5

To open the Report, simply double-click on the words “FIELD REPORT” above, and the PDF file will open for you; you may then download the file to your own computer, or read here, at your leisure.

Substantiation of this Report may be provided, in part, by similar published reports in the Michigan dunes on the BFRO website, notably at Sleeping Bear Dunes[1] and at Caseville, in Huron County.[2] No doubt there are additional, similar reports of this type, which may not be published.

Further substantiation may be provided by my own field work at Area D, which began in earnest at this time and which has continued, albeit at intervals, through the autumn of 2014; future field work at this location has not yet been determined. Numerous behaviours and evidences documented therein suggest the presence of EC at Area D, although permanent habitation has not been confirmed. Nonetheless, it is reasonable to suggest a significant level of activity throughout the year.

The combination of physical, visual, audible and/or olfactory events described in this Report are as follows:

  1. The numerous footprints observed on the dune slopes;
  2. The overall shape, size and depth of the footprints observed;
  3. The line of travel, lack of turn-out, lack of straddle, and stride length of the footprints observed;
  4. The numerous, possible branch assemblies observed in the woods;
  5. The horizontal branches dragged across the trail.

Based upon these behaviours, and the history, it is reasonable to suggest the presence of EC[3] at Area D; subsequent investigations and field visits have yielded a remarkable wealth of information, which will be published as part of my on-going efforts to update my Reports from this location.

A number of subjective events also occurred. While these cannot be considered conclusive evidence, neither should they be discounted. Although it is reasonable to review the impact of non-objective stimuli in this Report, such effects, while personally quite vivid and at times overwhelming, are nonetheless nearly impossible to substantiate with any measure of certainly.

[1] Kim Fleming. Description of Several Strange Encounters along Sleeping Bear Dunes National Shoreline. Bigfoot Field Researchers’ Organisation. http://www.bfro.net/gdb/show_report.asp?id=37797. 27 November 2012. Web. Accessed 9 September 2014.

[2] BFRO Author(s). Apelike Creature Seen by Children on a Sand Dune near Caseville. Bigfoot Field Researchers’ Organisation. http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=5652. 15 January 2003. Web. Accessed 9 September 2014.

[3] EC, in this context, stands for “Elder Children”, as usual.

To open the Report, simply double-click on the words “FIELD REPORT” above, and the PDF file will open for you; you may then download the file to your own computer, or read here, at your leisure.

Sanjay R Singhal, RA

BEYOND THE FOREST LOGO

Please feel free to like/join my Facebook page and post your comments and/or questions about this, or any other of my reports and postings; there are more reports being issued, and more branch-assembly analyses, so stay tuned!

Copyright © 2014 Sanjay R Singhal, RA.  All rights reserved.

Advertisements

One comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s