Field Report 05.14.2010: Salt Fork State Park (with Addenda)

SS100514.SF004a
With Bob Gimlin at the lodge; May 14, 2010.  Copyright © 2014 Sanjay R Singhal, RA.  All rights reserved.

FIELD REPORT 05.14.2010v4

FIELD REPORT 05.14.2010 ADDENDUM 01

FIELD REPORT 05.14.2010 ADDENDUM 02

The recent recovery of many of my original field photographs (but not all of them, sadly enough), taken at Salt Fork State Park in May 2010, and therefore pertinent to this Report, has enabled me to review same in greater detail; new analyses have suggested some startling possibilities.

To open either the Report or the Addenda, simply double-click on the words “FIELD REPORT” or “ADDENDUM” above, and the PDF file will open for you; you may then download the file to your own computer, or read here, at your leisure.

Substantiation of this Report, and the behaviours described therein, may be provided, in part, by various reports published on the BFRO website,[1]and others. Nonetheless, a cursory view of sightings at Salt Fork State Park suggests considerable activity in this area, both historic[2] and contemporary.[3]

The combination of physical, visual, audible and/or olfactory events at Parker Road are as follows:

  1. The possible branch assemblies observed in the woods;
  2. The sounds of movement in the woods flanking the vehicle access road;
  3. The large, white rock placed upon the downed tree trunk.

These factors, alone or in combination with past experience(s),[4] may be considered sufficient to confirm the presence of EC[5] at Parker Road. Further developments at the campground, the adjoining woods, and/or the number of visitors thereto, may have affected same; I have only returned to this area a few times since then. Further investigation may provide additional information regarding possible habitation in this area, either permanent or itinerant.

A number of subjective events also occurred. While these cannot be considered conclusive evidence, neither should they be discounted. Although it is reasonable to review the impact of non-objective stimuli in this Report, such effects, while personally quite vivid and at times overwhelming, are nonetheless nearly impossible to substantiate with any measure of certainly.

[1] There is only one report for 2010 in Guernsey County on the BFRO website; I simply haven’t had time to look for others just yet. BFRO Author(s). Guernsey County, Ohio. The Bigfoot Field Researchers’ Organisation. http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_county_reports.asp?state=oh&county=Guernsey. Date Unknown. Web. Accessed 14 August 2014.

[2] The Monster Site Authors. The Monster Quest Search for the Ohio Grassman. The Monster Site. http://themonstersite.com/north-amercan-bigfoot/2-monsterquest-episodes/33-the-monsterquest-search-fo-the-ohio-grassman. 21 February 2010. Web. Accessed 3 August 2014.

[3] Dan Davis. Discovery of Tracks Leaves Impression on Men Who Found Them. The Daily and Sunday Jeffersonian. http://daily-jeff.com/local%20news/2014/02/25/discovery-of-tracks-leaves-impression-on-men-who-found-them#.Uw1p9hQTQgg.facebook. 25 February 2014. Web. Accessed 3 August 2014.

[4] Ibid, Singhal.

[5] EC, in this context, stands for “Elder Children”, as usual.

To open either the Report or the Addenda, simply double-click on the words “FIELD REPORT” or “ADDENDUM” above, and the PDF file will open for you; you may then download the file to your own computer, or read here, at your leisure.

Sanjay R Singhal, RA

BEYOND THE FOREST LOGO

Please feel free to like/join my Facebook page and post your comments and/or questions about this, or any other of my reports and postings; there are more reports being issued, and more branch-assembly analyses, so stay tuned!

Copyright © 2014 Sanjay R Singhal, RA.  All rights reserved.